CMA in one sentence
CMA — Credit Monitoring Arrangement — is a standardised pack of financial statements that banks use to underwrite working-capital and term-loan facilities. It bundles your historical and projected numbers in a format the lender's credit team can compare apples-to-apples across borrowers.
For a Mudra loan, CMA is required for almost every Kishore and Tarun application, and increasingly for Shishu too if the loan funds equipment.
The seven CMA statements
A complete CMA pack contains seven statements:
- Particulars of existing / proposed limits — what credit lines you already have and what you are asking for
- Operating statement — revenue, COGS, operating expenses, EBITDA, PAT for past 2 years (actuals) + current year (estimate) + next 2–5 years (projections)
- Analysis of balance sheet — assets and liabilities laid out in current vs non-current
- Comparative statement of current assets and current liabilities — drilled down for working-capital sizing
- Calculation of MPBF (Maximum Permissible Bank Finance) — the formula the bank uses to cap your working-capital limit
- Funds flow statement — sources and uses of funds across years
- Ratio analysis — key ratios like current ratio, DSCR, gearing, asset turnover
Banks may add a few proprietary supplementary statements, but those seven are the universal core.
The two formulas every Mudra applicant should understand
MPBF (Method I — Tandon Committee)
MPBF = 0.75 × (Current Assets − Current Liabilities other than bank borrowing)
This is what the bank can lend you against working capital. If your current assets are Rs 5 lakh and non-bank current liabilities are Rs 1 lakh, MPBF = Rs 3 lakh.
DSCR — Debt Service Coverage Ratio
DSCR = (Net Profit + Depreciation + Interest) / (Interest + Principal Repayment)
Banks want DSCR ≥ 1.5x for Mudra loans. A DSCR of 1.5 means your business throws off 50% more cash than you need to service the loan — that headroom is the lender's comfort.
A project report with a DSCR below 1.25x will almost always be rejected. One above 2.5x looks unrealistic and triggers further questions.
A worked example — Kishore Rs 4 lakh tailoring unit
| Year | Revenue | COGS | Op Expenses | EBITDA | Depreciation | Interest | PBT | Tax | PAT | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Y1 | 12,00,000 | 7,20,000 | 1,80,000 | 3,00,000 | 60,000 | 38,000 | 2,02,000 | 0 | 2,02,000 | | Y2 | 14,40,000 | 8,64,000 | 2,16,000 | 3,60,000 | 60,000 | 30,000 | 2,70,000 | 0 | 2,70,000 | | Y3 | 17,28,000 | 10,37,000 | 2,59,000 | 4,32,000 | 60,000 | 22,000 | 3,50,000 | 0 | 3,50,000 | | Y4 | 20,73,600 | 12,44,000 | 3,11,000 | 5,18,000 | 60,000 | 14,000 | 4,44,000 | 0 | 4,44,000 | | Y5 | 24,88,000 | 14,93,000 | 3,73,000 | 6,22,000 | 60,000 | 6,000 | 5,56,000 | 0 | 5,56,000 |
DSCR Year 1:
(2,02,000 + 60,000 + 38,000) / (38,000 + 76,000) = 3,00,000 / 1,14,000 = 2.63x
That comfortably clears the 1.5x threshold. Banks would sanction this on the numbers alone (assuming clean CIBIL, KYC, and premises).
Why DIY CMA usually fails
Building a credible CMA pack by hand requires:
- Sector-specific revenue growth assumptions (% YoY revenue growth, gross margin range)
- Working-capital cycle assumptions (days of inventory, debtor days, creditor days)
- Capex depreciation schedule (asset-class specific rates)
- Tax treatment for proprietorship / partnership / LLP
- Ratio coherence across statements
Tiny errors (e.g. depreciation rate mismatch between P&L and balance sheet) cascade across all seven statements. By the time a banker spots one inconsistency, the entire pack loses credibility.
This is why most applicants outsource CMA to a CA (Rs 3,000 – Rs 15,000) — or use the Mudra loan project report generator which produces all seven CMA statements automatically, with internally consistent numbers across the pack.
How banks actually read CMA
A senior credit officer told us they look at three things in this order:
- DSCR Year 1 — must be ≥ 1.5x. If not, file goes back.
- Revenue growth Y1 → Y5 — should be 12–25% CAGR. Anything above 35% gets flagged as aspirational.
- Gross margin — should match sector benchmarks. A tailoring unit claiming a 70% gross margin is a red flag.
If those three pass, they then read the qualitative sections of the report (market analysis, promoter background, capex breakdown).
CMA mistakes that fail credit
- Year-1 revenue at full capacity — banks expect a ramp-up; show Y1 at 60–70% capacity, Y2 at 80%, Y3+ at full
- No interest in projections — even if you're applying for the loan, the interest line must be included from Year 1
- Negative cash flow without explanation — Y1 cash flow can be tight, but you need to show how it's covered (margin contribution, OD facility)
- Inconsistent depreciation between P&L and balance sheet — easiest way to lose credibility
- Tax line at 30% for a proprietorship — proprietorships are taxed at slab rates, not corporate rates
- Receivables growing faster than revenue — implies poor collection, lowers DSCR
What goes in the report vs in the CMA pack
| Item | Goes in narrative section | Goes in CMA pack | | --- | --- | --- | | Business description | ✓ | — | | Market analysis | ✓ | — | | Promoter profile | ✓ | — | | Capex breakdown | ✓ | ✓ (as fixed-asset schedule) | | Revenue projections | summary | ✓ (full operating statement) | | Balance sheet | — | ✓ | | Working-capital sizing | — | ✓ (MPBF calc) | | Loan repayment schedule | summary | ✓ (in funds-flow) | | DSCR | — | ✓ (ratio analysis) |
A complete Mudra project report ships both — the narrative for context, the CMA pack for the underwriting maths. Skipping the CMA pack is the fastest way to get the file returned.
Quick CMA self-audit
Before submission, check:
- [ ] DSCR Y1 ≥ 1.5x
- [ ] Current ratio Y1 ≥ 1.3x
- [ ] Revenue Y1 = 60–70% of full capacity
- [ ] Revenue CAGR Y1–Y5 = 12–25%
- [ ] Gross margin in sector benchmark range
- [ ] Tax line correct for entity type
- [ ] All numbers tie across operating statement, balance sheet, funds-flow
- [ ] Loan amount and tenure on application form match the funds-flow statement
If all eight check out, your CMA pack is bank-ready. If you want the pack auto-generated with sector-defaulted assumptions, the free Mudra loan project report tool does it in one go.
Need a Mudra loan project report?
Generate a professional, bank-ready project report in minutes with AI. First report on us — lifetime.
Generate Free with AI